[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10820bce-69fa-4cee-f95b-5a8de20388d1@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:01:38 +0800
From: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@...el.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...ux.intel.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, corbet@....net, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, jingqi.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: x86: add support for user wait instructions
On 6/19/2019 2:23 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>
>
> On 6/19/2019 2:09 PM, Tao Xu wrote:
>> UMONITOR, UMWAIT and TPAUSE are a set of user wait instructions.
>> This patch adds support for user wait instructions in KVM. Availability
>> of the user wait instructions is indicated by the presence of the CPUID
>> feature flag WAITPKG CPUID.0x07.0x0:ECX[5]. User wait instructions may
>> be executed at any privilege level, and use IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR to
>> set the maximum time.
>>
>> The behavior of user wait instructions in VMX non-root operation is
>> determined first by the setting of the "enable user wait and pause"
>> secondary processor-based VM-execution control bit 26.
>> If the VM-execution control is 0, UMONITOR/UMWAIT/TPAUSE cause
>> an invalid-opcode exception (#UD).
>> If the VM-execution control is 1, treatment is based on the
>> setting of the “RDTSC exiting” VM-execution control. Because KVM never
>> enables RDTSC exiting, if the instruction causes a delay, the amount of
>> time delayed is called here the physical delay. The physical delay is
>> first computed by determining the virtual delay. If
>> IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL[31:2] is zero, the virtual delay is the value in
>> EDX:EAX minus the value that RDTSC would return; if
>> IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL[31:2] is not zero, the virtual delay is the minimum
>> of that difference and AND(IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL,FFFFFFFCH).
>>
>> Because umwait and tpause can put a (psysical) CPU into a power saving
>> state, by default we dont't expose it to kvm and enable it only when
>> guest CPUID has it.
>>
>> Detailed information about user wait instructions can be found in the
>> latest Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> no changes in v4.
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 6 ++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ++++
>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> index a39136b0d509..8f00882664d3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
>> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_USE_GPA 0x01000000
>> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC 0x00400000
>> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING 0x02000000
>> +#define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE 0x04000000
>> #define PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK 0x00000001
>> #define PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING 0x00000008
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index e18a9f9f65b5..48bd851a6ae5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct
>> kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>> F(AVX512VBMI) | F(LA57) | F(PKU) | 0 /*OSPKE*/ |
>> F(AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ) | F(UMIP) | F(AVX512_VBMI2) | F(GFNI) |
>> F(VAES) | F(VPCLMULQDQ) | F(AVX512_VNNI) | F(AVX512_BITALG) |
>> - F(CLDEMOTE) | F(MOVDIRI) | F(MOVDIR64B);
>> + F(CLDEMOTE) | F(MOVDIRI) | F(MOVDIR64B) | 0 /*WAITPKG*/;
>> /* cpuid 7.0.edx*/
>> const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> index d6664ee3d127..fd77e17651b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> @@ -253,6 +253,12 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_tsc_scaling(void)
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING;
>> }
>> +static inline bool vmx_waitpkg_supported(void)
>> +{
>> + return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
>> + SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE;
>
> Shouldn't it be
> return vmx->secondary_exec_control &
> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE; ?
vmx->secondary_exec_control is another way to get SECONDARY_EXEC_CONTROL
but it need to add vmx as input. Use vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl
is easy expand to use in other place.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists