| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:12:11 +0530
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, agross@...nel.org,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Павел <be.dissent@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: Add ipq6018 SoC and CP01 board support
Hi Christian,
On 6/15/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote:
>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>
>>>> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and
>>>>>> CP01 evaluation board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + clocks {
>>>>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>>>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>>>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>;
>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk
>>>>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML.
>>>>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK
>>>>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and
>>>>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for
>>>>> the IPQ6018.
>>>>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What exactly is the issue that you faced ?
>>>> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well.
>>>
>>> We need just a confirmation.
>>>
>>> Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz.
>>>
>>> | sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>> | compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> | clock-frequency = <32768>;
>>> | #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> | };
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144>
>>>
>>> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the
>>> future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock.
>>>
>>> For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external
>>> oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)".
>>> Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec
>>> depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz.
>>> (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same
>>> in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock".
>>>
>>> For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML:
>>> <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html>
>>> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz
>>> sleep clock."
>>>
>>> So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing.
>>> Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values
>>> listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values
>>> are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it.
>>>
>>
>> Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived
>> from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ.
> That's really valuable information to have. Thank you!
>
>> Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses
>> out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the
>> ipq8074.dtsi as well
>
> Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019),
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482
>
> it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by
> the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep
> clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U)
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> xo 9 9 48000000 0 0
> [...]
> sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0
> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0
> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0
> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0
>
> with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better"
>
> (something like this:)
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> xo 9 9 48000000 0 0
> [...]
> gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0
> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0
>
> but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an
> external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk
> should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be:
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> xo 10 10 48000000 0 0
> [...]
> gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0
> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0
>
> or am I missing/skipping over something important?
>
Sorry for the delayed response. So what i said above (32768 clk) looks
like true only for ipq8074. For ipq4019, looks like 32000.
That means, there is still some thing unclear. I am checking for precise
information from HW team for ipq4019/8074/6018. Please hang on, will
update you asap.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists