[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190619154648.13840-3-lukas.s.schneider@fau.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:46:47 +0200
From: Lukas Schneider <lukas.s.schneider@....de>
To: kim.jamie.bradley@...il.com, pakki001@....edu,
colin.king@...onical.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lukas Schneider <lukas.s.schneider@....de>,
Jannik Moritz <jannik.moritz@....de>, linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rts5208: Fix usleep_range is preferred over udelay
This patch fixes the issue reported by checkpatch:
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay;
see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt
It's save to sleep here instead of using busy waiting,
because we are not in an atomic context.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Schneider <lukas.s.schneider@....de>
Signed-off-by: Jannik Moritz <jannik.moritz@....de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de>
---
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
index 76c35f3c0208..8cddfe542d56 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ void rtsx_exit_ss(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
if (chip->power_down_in_ss) {
rtsx_force_power_on(chip, SSC_PDCTL | OC_PDCTL);
- udelay(1000);
+ usleep_range(1000, 1010);
}
if (RTSX_TST_DELINK(chip)) {
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists