linux-kernel - Re: [IMX] [DRM]: suspend/resume support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22247.1560961607@turing-police>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:26:47 -0400
From:   "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To:     Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>
Subject: Re: [IMX] [DRM]: suspend/resume support

On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:47:34 +0530, Pintu Agarwal said:

> No I mean to say, there are lots of features and customization already
> done on this version and stabilized.
> Upgrading again may require months of effort.

This is what happens when you don't upstream your local changes.

And no, saying "But we're a small company and nobody cares" isn't an
excuse - Linux carried the entire Voyager architecture around for several years
for 2 machines. Not two models, 2 physical machines, the last 2 operational
systems of the product line.

(Not the Xubuntu-based Voyage distribution either - the Voyager was a mid-80s
SMP fault-tolerant system from NCR with up to 32 486/586 cores and 4G of
memory, which was a honking big system for the day...)

https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux/+/v2.6.20-rc1/Documentation/voyager.txt

The architecture was finally dropped in 2009 when enough hardware failures
had happened that James Bottomley was unable to create a bootable
system from the parts from both...

So if your production run is several thousand systems, that's *plenty* big
enough for patches and drivers (especially since drivers for hardware you
included in your several-thousand system run are also likely applicable to
a half dozen other vendors who made several thousand systems using the
same chipset....

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped