[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wohgfnny.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:26:25 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] x86/KVM/svm: get rid of hardcoded instructions lengths
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
> On 20/06/19 13:02, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>
>> P.S. If you'd like to test the series you'll have to have a CPU without
>> NRIP_SAVE feature or forcefully disable it, something like:
>>
>> index 8d4e50428b68..93c7eaad7915 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
>> @@ -922,6 +922,9 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> /* AMD CPUs don't reset SS attributes on SYSRET, Xen does. */
>> if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XENPV))
>> set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS);
>> +
>> + /* No nrips */
>> + clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NRIPS);
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>
> Let's add a module parameter instead. Patch sent (forgot to Cc you).
>
Sure, I thought I'm the only interested person around but if there's
hope for more this definitely sounds like a good idea)
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists