linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:33:26 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:     "wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com" <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        "bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com" 
        <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "peda@...ntia.se" <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Steve Twiss wrote:

> On 20 June 2019 13:29, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too
> > 
> > Why isn't this reply attached (threaded) to the patch.
> 
> My apologies. It wasn't my intention to split Wolfram's original e-mail thread.
> 
> I don't usually reply using the mailto: link from lore when creating e-mails.
> Outlook mustn't support the In-Reply-To header.
> 
> I'll figure out a different way to reply in future.
> 
> > Is your mailer broken?
> 
> It's Windows

Say no more. ;)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog