linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate new AVX512 BFLOAT16 instructions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190620140614.GA238683@romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:06:15 -0700
From:   Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate new AVX512 BFLOAT16
 instructions

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 02:34:04PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> You need to test the sub-leaf index validity here before accessing
> subleaf 1:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 4910cb421b82..dad20bc891d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -848,8 +848,11 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_ECX] = ecx;
>  		c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_EDX] = edx;
>  
> -		cpuid_count(0x00000007, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> -		c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_1_EAX] = eax;
> +		/* Check valid sub-leaf index before accessing it */
> +		if (eax >= 1) {
> +			cpuid_count(0x00000007, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> +			c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_1_EAX] = eax;
> +		}

You are right.

I tested the three patches in tip tree and they work as expected.

Thank you very much!

-Fenghua