[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo50vSNCTTTKp9D_07tazOE9YkU-zKAsDywvWe6h0NgcEmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:12:16 +0100
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Yannick Fertré <yannick.fertre@...com>
Cc: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
Vincent Abriou <vincent.abriou@...com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/stm: drv: fix suspend/resume
Hi Yannick,
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 08:18, Yannick Fertré <yannick.fertre@...com> wrote:
> @@ -155,15 +154,17 @@ static __maybe_unused int drv_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct ltdc_device *ldev = ddev->dev_private;
> int ret;
>
> + if (WARN_ON(!ldev->suspend_state))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> ret = drm_atomic_helper_resume(ddev, ldev->suspend_state);
> - if (ret) {
> + if (ret)
Hmm the msm driver uses !ret here. Suspecting that you want the same,
although I haven't checked in detail.
HTH
-Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists