[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <054f3ab6-0a03-ff0e-ac46-5d0fba012cf0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:18:55 +0300
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dennis@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix misuse of blk_rq_stats in blk-iolatency
Hi,
Josef, thanks for taking a look.
Although, there is nothing critical yet -- just a not working / disabled
optimisation, but changes in stats could sublty break it. E.g. grouping
@batch and @mean into a union will increase estimated average by several
orders of magnitude.
Jens, what do you think?
On 14/06/2019 16:40, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:44:11PM +0300, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
>> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>>
>> There are implicit assumptions about struct blk_rq_stats, which make
>> it's very easy to misuse. The first patch fixes consequences, and the
>> second employs type-system to prevent recurrences.
>>
>>
>> Pavel Begunkov (2):
>> blk-iolatency: Fix zero mean in previous stats
>> blk-stats: Introduce explicit stat staging buffers
>>
>
> I don't have a problem with this, but it's up to Jens I suppose
>
> Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Josef
>
--
Yours sincerely,
Pavel Begunkov
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists