[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <226043f8-4dc6-1ad3-7c66-8d85312f4cae@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:37:48 -0700
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dennis@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix misuse of blk_rq_stats in blk-iolatency
Ping?
On 20/06/2019 10:18, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Josef, thanks for taking a look.
>
>
> Although, there is nothing critical yet -- just a not working / disabled
> optimisation, but changes in stats could sublty break it. E.g. grouping
> @batch and @mean into a union will increase estimated average by several
> orders of magnitude.
>
> Jens, what do you think?
>
>
>
> On 14/06/2019 16:40, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:44:11PM +0300, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
>>> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>>>
>>> There are implicit assumptions about struct blk_rq_stats, which make
>>> it's very easy to misuse. The first patch fixes consequences, and the
>>> second employs type-system to prevent recurrences.
>>>
>>>
>>> Pavel Begunkov (2):
>>> blk-iolatency: Fix zero mean in previous stats
>>> blk-stats: Introduce explicit stat staging buffers
>>>
>>
>> I don't have a problem with this, but it's up to Jens I suppose
>>
>> Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Josef
>>
>
--
Yours sincerely,
Pavel Begunkov
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists