[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a14=isYJFZYZ5BGGPQY0eLCA7zswHTt=F7Yd4kN-8EtrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:29:06 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: add missing non-_ns functions for fast accessors
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 4:12 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> Previously there was no analogue to get proper ktime_t versions of the
> fast variety of ktime invocations. This commit makes the interface
> uniform with the other accessors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Consistent is good, not sure if there is a real use for the *_fast()
functions returning a ktime_t, but I don't mind adding them.
> +.. c:function:: ktime_t ktime_get_mono_fast_ns( void )
> + ktime_t ktime_get_raw_fast_ns( void )
> + ktime_t ktime_get_boottime_fast_ns( void )
> + ktime_t ktime_get_real_fast_ns( void )
> +
> .. c:function:: u64 ktime_get_mono_fast_ns( void )
> u64 ktime_get_raw_fast_ns( void )
> u64 ktime_get_boot_fast_ns( void )
Typo: you have the same function names listed twice here,
one of them should be ktime_get_mono_fast() instead of
ktime_get_mono_fast_ns().
Also, we might want to rename ktime_get_boot_fast_ns()
to ktime_get_boottime_fast_ns in the process. It seems there
is only a single caller.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists