linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] timekeeping: use proper ktime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1_arn_4gUdwYJeuxTcYQgiakFpdci7LauRd0j+3eb3qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:29:50 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] timekeeping: use proper ktime_add when adding nsecs
 in coarse offset

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 4:12 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> While this doesn't actually amount to a real difference, since the macro
> evaluates to the same thing, every place else operates on ktime_t using
> these functions, so let's not break the pattern.
>
> Fixes: e3ff9c3678b4 ("timekeeping: Repair ktime_get_coarse*() granularity")
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>