[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190622204416.33871-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 22:44:16 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block, bfq: fix operator in BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY
By mistake, there is a '&' instead of a '==' in the definition of the
macro BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY. This commit replaces the wrong operator with
the correct one.
Fixes: commit 7074f076ff15 ("block, bfq: do not tag totally seeky queues as soft rt")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index f8d430f88d25..f9269ae6da9c 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *bfq_pool;
* containing only random (seeky) I/O are prevented from being tagged
* as soft real-time.
*/
-#define BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) (bfqq->seek_history & -1)
+#define BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) (bfqq->seek_history == -1)
/* Min number of samples required to perform peak-rate update */
#define BFQ_RATE_MIN_SAMPLES 32
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists