linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190624135930.vebfuh4ntn32nbrk@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:29:30 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, edubezval@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: Move the IS_ENABLED(CPU_THERMAL) macro
 in a stub

On 24-06-19, 15:17, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The cpufreq_online and the cpufreq_offline [un]register the driver as
> a cooling device. This is done if the driver is flagged as a cooling
> device in addition with a IS_ENABLED macro to compile out the branching
> code.
> 
> Group this test in a stub function added in the cpufreq header instead
> of having the IS_ENABLED in the code path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++----
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh