[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528dcb2e-3611-00a7-abb2-cc18001f4f8f@axentia.se>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:07:50 +0000
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"atull@...nel.org" <atull@...nel.org>,
"mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/28] drivers: Introduce
class_find_device_by_of_node() helper
On 2019-06-24 10:34, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 22/06/2019 06:25, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2019-06-14 19:54, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Add a wrapper to class_find_device() to search for a device
>>> by the of_node pointer, reusing the generic match function.
>>> Also convert the existing users to make use of the new helper.
>>>
>>> Cc: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>>> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>>> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
>>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>>> Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>>
>> Whoooa! I reviewed only the drivers/mux/core.c changes when this was done
>> in a series of much smaller patches. This tag makes it seem as if I have
>> reviewed the whole thing, which I had not done when you added this tag out
>> of the blue.
>
> Apologies for the surprise. The patch was simply squashed with the change that
> introduced the "helper" to better aid the reviewers, based on suggestions on the
> list. I kept your tags, only because there were no changes, but some additional
> context on the core driver.
You could e.g. have written:
...
[For the drivers/mux/core.c part]
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
...
>>
>> Now, this stuff is trivial and by now I have looked at the other files
>> and it all seems simple enough. So, you can keep the tag, but it is NOT
>> ok to handle tags like you have done here.
>
> Sure, I will keep that in mind.
Great!
Cheers,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists