linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm-nommu: remove the partial DMA_ATTR_NON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a017e704-c6c4-7718-7f8b-eb8a0eced14d@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:23:08 +0100
From:   Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm-nommu: remove the partial DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT
 support

On 6/14/19 3:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The arm-nommu DMA code supports DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT allocations, but
> does not provide a cache_sync operation.  This means any user of it
> will never be able to actually transfer cache ownership and thus cause
> coherency bugs.

By the way, Documentation/DMA-attributes.txt doesn't specify cache_sync() as
requirement for DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT it only states that it is responsibility
of the driver to have all the correct and necessary sync points.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c | 24 +++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> index f304b10e23a4..bc003df45546 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> @@ -39,18 +39,7 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  				 unsigned long attrs)
>  
>  {
> -	void *ret;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Try generic allocator first if we are advertised that
> -	 * consistency is not required.
> -	 */
> -
> -	if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> -		return dma_direct_alloc_pages(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp,
> -				attrs);
> -
> -	ret = dma_alloc_from_global_coherent(size, dma_handle);
> +	void *ret = dma_alloc_from_global_coherent(size, dma_handle);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * dma_alloc_from_global_coherent() may fail because:
> @@ -70,16 +59,9 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  			       void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
>  			       unsigned long attrs)
>  {
> -	if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) {
> -		dma_direct_free_pages(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_addr, attrs);
> -	} else {
> -		int ret = dma_release_from_global_coherent(get_order(size),
> -							   cpu_addr);
> -
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == 0);
> -	}
> +	int ret = dma_release_from_global_coherent(get_order(size), cpu_addr);
>  
> -	return;
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == 0);
>  }
>  
>  static int arm_nommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> 

FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>

Cheers
Vladimir