[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+zceAZ0Mqhz3t6Ob71-Dgk4DNHRrzr72r+qEsUugwzTsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:22:34 +0200
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, enh <enh@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 04/15] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:46 PM Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/19/19 9:55 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> > On 6/12/19 5:43 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >> This patch is a part of a series that extends arm64 kernel ABI to allow to
> >> pass tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other
> >> than 0x00) as syscall arguments.
> >>
> >> This patch allows tagged pointers to be passed to the following memory
> >> syscalls: get_mempolicy, madvise, mbind, mincore, mlock, mlock2, mprotect,
> >> mremap, msync, munlock, move_pages.
> >>
> >> The mmap and mremap syscalls do not currently accept tagged addresses.
> >> Architectures may interpret the tag as a background colour for the
> >> corresponding vma.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
> >
> >
>
> I would also recommend updating commit log for all the patches in this
> series that are changing files under mm/ as opposed to arch/arm64 to not
> reference arm64 kernel ABI since the change applies to every
> architecture. So something along the lines of "This patch is part of a
> series that extends kernel ABI to allow......."
Sure, will do in v18, thanks!
>
> --
> Khalid
>
>
> >> mm/madvise.c | 2 ++
> >> mm/mempolicy.c | 3 +++
> >> mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
> >> mm/mincore.c | 2 ++
> >> mm/mlock.c | 4 ++++
> >> mm/mprotect.c | 2 ++
> >> mm/mremap.c | 7 +++++++
> >> mm/msync.c | 2 ++
> >> 8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> >> index 628022e674a7..39b82f8a698f 100644
> >> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> >> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> >> @@ -810,6 +810,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise, unsigned long, start, size_t, len_in, int, behavior)
> >> size_t len;
> >> struct blk_plug plug;
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> +
> >> if (!madvise_behavior_valid(behavior))
> >> return error;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> >> index 01600d80ae01..78e0a88b2680 100644
> >> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> >> @@ -1360,6 +1360,7 @@ static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
> >> int err;
> >> unsigned short mode_flags;
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> >> mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> >> if (mode >= MPOL_MAX)
> >> @@ -1517,6 +1518,8 @@ static int kernel_get_mempolicy(int __user *policy,
> >> int uninitialized_var(pval);
> >> nodemask_t nodes;
> >>
> >> + addr = untagged_addr(addr);
> >> +
> >> if (nmask != NULL && maxnode < nr_node_ids)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> >> index f2ecc2855a12..d22c45cf36b2 100644
> >> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> >> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> >> @@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
> >> goto out_flush;
> >> if (get_user(node, nodes + i))
> >> goto out_flush;
> >> - addr = (unsigned long)p;
> >> + addr = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(p);
> >>
> >> err = -ENODEV;
> >> if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> >> diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
> >> index c3f058bd0faf..64c322ed845c 100644
> >> --- a/mm/mincore.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mincore.c
> >> @@ -249,6 +249,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mincore, unsigned long, start, size_t, len,
> >> unsigned long pages;
> >> unsigned char *tmp;
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> +
> >> /* Check the start address: needs to be page-aligned.. */
> >> if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
> >> return -EINVAL;fixup_user_fault
> >> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> >> index 080f3b36415b..e82609eaa428 100644
> >> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> >> @@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ static __must_check int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, vm_flags_t fla
> >> unsigned long lock_limit;
> >> int error = -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> +
> >> if (!can_do_mlock())
> >> return -EPERM;
> >>
> >> @@ -735,6 +737,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
> >> {
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> +
> >> len = PAGE_ALIGN(len + (offset_in_page(start)));
> >> start &= PAGE_MASK;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> >> index bf38dfbbb4b4..19f981b733bc 100644
> >> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> >> @@ -465,6 +465,8 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long start, size_t len,
> >> const bool rier = (current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) &&
> >> (prot & PROT_READ);
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> +
> >> prot &= ~(PROT_GROWSDOWN|PROT_GROWSUP);
> >> if (grows == (PROT_GROWSDOWN|PROT_GROWSUP)) /* can't be both */
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
> >> index fc241d23cd97..64c9a3b8be0a 100644
> >> --- a/mm/mremap.c
> >> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
> >> @@ -606,6 +606,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len,
> >> LIST_HEAD(uf_unmap_early);
> >> LIST_HEAD(uf_unmap);
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Architectures may interpret the tag passed to mmap as a background
> >> + * colour for the corresponding vma. For mremap we don't allow tagged
> >> + * new_addr to preserve similar behaviour to mmap.
> >> + */
> >> + addr = untagged_addr(addr);
> >> +
> >> if (flags & ~(MREMAP_FIXED | MREMAP_MAYMOVE))
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/msync.c b/mm/msync.c
> >> index ef30a429623a..c3bd3e75f687 100644
> >> --- a/mm/msync.c
> >> +++ b/mm/msync.c
> >> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(msync, unsigned long, start, size_t, len, int, flags)
> >> int unmapped_error = 0;
> >> int error = -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> + start = untagged_addr(start);
> >> +
> >> if (flags & ~(MS_ASYNC | MS_INVALIDATE | MS_SYNC))
> >> goto out;
> >> if (offset_in_page(start))
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists