[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdc87d42-8a5c-5b12-c746-896e3324cb35@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:49:25 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per
symbol
On 6/24/2019 3:57 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:36:39PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +
>> +static void *block_entry_zalloc(size_t size)
>> +{
>> + return zalloc(size + sizeof(struct hist_entry));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void block_entry_free(void *he)
>> +{
>> + struct block_info *bi = ((struct hist_entry *)he)->block_info;
>> +
>> + block_info__put(bi);
>> + free(he);
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct hist_entry_ops block_entry_ops = {
>> + .new = block_entry_zalloc,
>> + .free = block_entry_free,
>> +};
>
> hum, so there's already block_hist_ops moving that stuff into 'struct block_hist',
> which is great, but why don't we have 'struct block_entry' in here? that would
> keep the 'struct block_info'
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
Hi Jiri,
If I define 'struct block_entry' as following and cast 'he' to 'struct
block_entry' in some places, such as in block_cmp(), we can get the
'struct block_entry'.
struct block_entry {
struct block_info bi;
struct hist_entry he;
};
But I don't know when I can set the 'bi' of 'struct block_entry'. Before
or after calling hists__add_entry_xxx()? Before calling
hists__add_entry_xxx(), we don't know the hist_entry. After calling
hists__add_entry_xxx(), actually the hist_entry__cmp doesn't work (no bi ).
That's why I create block_info in hist_entry. Maybe I misunderstand what
your suggested, correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists