[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0c60ec9-2f57-c3f5-c3b4-ee83a5ec4c45@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:38:23 +0000
From: <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
To: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <yash.shah@...ive.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<palmer@...ive.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <ynezz@...e.cz>,
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <sachin.ghadi@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/macb: bindings doc: add sifive fu540-c000 binding
On 23/05/2019 at 22:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:46 AM Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add the compatibility string documentation for SiFive FU540-C0000
>> interface.
>> On the FU540, this driver also needs to read and write registers in a
>> management IP block that monitors or drives boundary signals for the
>> GEMGXL IP block that are not directly mapped to GEMGXL registers.
>> Therefore, add additional range to "reg" property for SiFive GEMGXL
>> management IP registers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt
>> index 9c5e944..91a2a66 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/macb.txt
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
>> - compatible: Should be "cdns,[<chip>-]{macb|gem}"
>> Use "cdns,at91rm9200-emac" Atmel at91rm9200 SoC.
>> Use "cdns,at91sam9260-macb" for Atmel at91sam9 SoCs.
>> + Use "cdns,fu540-macb" for SiFive FU540-C000 SoC.
>
> This pattern that Atmel started isn't really correct. The vendor
> prefix here should be sifive. 'cdns' would be appropriate for a
> fallback.
Ok, we missed this for the sam9x60 SoC that we added recently then.
Anyway a little too late, coming back to this machine, and talking to
Yash, isn't "sifive,fu540-c000-macb" more specific and a better match
for being future proof? I would advice for the most specific possible
with other compatible strings on the same line in the DT, like:
"sifive,fu540-c000-macb", "sifive,fu540-macb"
Moreover, is it really a "macb" or a "gem" type of interface from
Cadence? Not a big deal, but just to discuss the topic to the bone...
Note that I'm fine if you consider that what you have in net-next new is
correct.
Regards,
Nicolas
>> Use "cdns,sam9x60-macb" for Microchip sam9x60 SoC.
>> Use "cdns,np4-macb" for NP4 SoC devices.
>> Use "cdns,at32ap7000-macb" for other 10/100 usage or use the generic form: "cdns,macb".
>> @@ -17,6 +18,8 @@ Required properties:
>> Use "cdns,zynqmp-gem" for Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC.
>> Or the generic form: "cdns,emac".
>> - reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
>> + For "cdns,fu540-macb", second range is required to specify the
>> + address and length of the registers for GEMGXL Management block.
>> - interrupts: Should contain macb interrupt
>> - phy-mode: See ethernet.txt file in the same directory.
>> - clock-names: Tuple listing input clock names.
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists