linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] habanalabs: enable 64-bit DMA mask in POWER9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:53:20 +0300
From:   Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] habanalabs: enable 64-bit DMA mask in POWER9

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:35 AM Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:19 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 02:24:08PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > So the alternative is that my device won't work on POWER9.
> >
> > The alternative is that we fix the powerpc code to do the right
> > thing, which already is in progress.
> Great, I agree this is the correct approach, and that's why I wrote in
> my earlier email:
>
> "I'll of course monitor the PPC code upstream and if they will manage
> to push a fix to their current DMA mask limitation (that will allow
> setting dma mask of 48 bits and without setting bit 59 in outbound
> transactions), I will modify my code accordingly and then this hack
> won't be necessary. But for now, it is what it is."
>
> So I don't get it why you object for this temporary fix in my driver.
>
> Thanks,
> Oded

Hi,
I didn't get any reply to my last email.
Can we continue this discussion ?

Thanks,
Oded