linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fsi: sbefifo: Don't fail operations when in SBE IPL state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190625072407.GA18197@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:24:07 +0800
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsi: sbefifo: Don't fail operations when in SBE IPL state

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:35:50AM +0000, Joel Stanley wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 05:41, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 02:09, Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, 21 January 2019 11:15:58 AM AEST Eddie James wrote:
> > > > SBE fifo operations should be allowed while the SBE is in any of the
> > > > "IPL" states. Operations should succeed in this state.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > This fixed the problem I was having trying to issue istep operations to the
> > > SBE.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>
> >
> > This one slipped through the cracks.
> >
> > Fixes: 9f4a8a2d7f9d fsi/sbefifo: Add driver for the SBE FIFO
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> >
> > Greg, can you please queue this one up for 5.3?
> 
> Ping?

I don't see this in my queue at all, sorry.  Can someone resend it in a
format that I can apply it in with the needed tested-by and reviewed-by
added to it?

thanks,

greg k-h