linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/5] *** DMA based UART driver for AST2500 ***

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:27:15 +0800
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     sudheer v <open.sudheer@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        ShivahShankar Shakarnarayan rao 
        <shivahshankar.shankarnarayanrao@...eedtech.com>,
        Shiva shankar <shivahshankar@...il.com>,
        Sudheer V <sudheer.veliseti@...eedtech.com>,
        sudheer veliseti <sudheer.open@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] *** DMA based UART driver for AST2500 ***

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:30:32AM +0530, sudheer v wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> When i last submitted patches, i have not added change-logs.
> and also used custom debugs instead of kernel dynamic debugs.
> So i have resubmitted the patches , considering you have discarded old set.
> I want to send any changes suggested  from now on wards  with versioning
> V1,V2...so on.
> Is this acceptable for you? or should i submit the patches again as V1 once
> again.?

No, please resend now as a v3 series, with the information that says
what you changed from the previous versions.

thanks,

greg k-h