[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84628b5e-bea7-7d91-f790-f3a2650040fa@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:14:13 +0000
From: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
To: <peda@...ntia.se>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: add binding for
enable-ana-filt
On 25.06.2019 11:55, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-25 10:05, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
>> From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Add binding specification for analogic filter inside the i2c controller
>
> s/analogic/the analog/
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt
>> index 8268595..20d334c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt
>> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ Optional properties:
>> - enable-dig-filt: Enable the built-in digital filter on the i2c lines,
>> specifically required depending on the hardware PCB/board and if the
>> version of the controller includes it.
>> +- enable-ana-filt: Enable the built-in analogic filter on the i2c lines,
>> + specifically required depending on the hardware PCB/board and if the
>> + version of the controller includes it.
>> - Child nodes conforming to i2c bus binding
>>
>> Examples :
>> @@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ i2c0: i2c@...34600 {
>> atmel,fifo-size = <16>;
>> i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <336>;
>> enable-dig-filt;
>> + enable-ana-filt;
>
> Perhaps
>
> microchip,digital-filter;
> microchip,analog-filter;
>
> ?
Hi Peter,
Thanks for reviewing. The name of the property does not matter much to
me, and we have properties prefixed with vendor, and some are not.
@Alexandre Belloni: which name you think it's best ?
Eugen
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
>>
>> wm8731: wm8731@1a {
>> compatible = "wm8731";
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists