linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: add binding for enable-ana-filt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190625093156.GF5690@piout.net>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:31:56 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com
Cc:     peda@...ntia.se, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com,
        wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: add binding for
 enable-ana-filt

On 25/06/2019 09:14:13+0000, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
> > Perhaps
> > 
> > 	microchip,digital-filter;
> > 	microchip,analog-filter;
> > 
> > ?
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Thanks for reviewing. The name of the property does not matter much to 
> me, and we have properties prefixed with vendor, and some are not.
> 
> @Alexandre Belloni: which name you think it's best ?
> 

I'm not sure, it depends on whether Wolfram thinks it is generic enough
to be used without a vendor prefix.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com