linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: Add irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:18:46 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: Add irq_enable callback for msm gpio

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:29 PM Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 6/25/19 2:28 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > Please don't name functions __like __that.
> >
> >> -static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> >> +static void __msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear)
> > Instead of __unclear __underscore __semantic use something
> > really descriptive like
> >
> > static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_irq()
> >
> > That is what it does, right?
>
> Is below ok? as it clears (if status_clear set) and then unmasks irq
>
> static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask()

Sure thing! Thanks.

Yours,
Linus Walleij