[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a99b04a3-f079-3a43-9e19-d9501b76a96e@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:06:56 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 1/2] regulator: lm363x: Fix off-by-one n_voltages for
lm3632 ldo_vpos/ldo_vneg
Hello
On 6/26/19 8:26 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> According to the datasheet https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm3632a.pdf
> Table 20. VPOS Bias Register Field Descriptions VPOS[5:0]
> Sets the Positive Display Bias (LDO) Voltage (50 mV per step)
> 000000: 4 V
> 000001: 4.05 V
> 000010: 4.1 V
> ....................
> 011101: 5.45 V
> 011110: 5.5 V (Default)
> 011111: 5.55 V
> ....................
> 100111: 5.95 V
> 101000: 6 V
> Note: Codes 101001 to 111111 map to 6 V
>
> The LM3632_LDO_VSEL_MAX should be 0b101000 (0x28), so the maximum voltage
> can match the datasheet.
>
> Fixes: 3a8d1a73a037 ("regulator: add LM363X driver")
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/lm363x-regulator.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/lm363x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/lm363x-regulator.c
> index 5647e2f97ff8..e4a27d63bf90 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/lm363x-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/lm363x-regulator.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>
> /* LM3632 */
> #define LM3632_BOOST_VSEL_MAX 0x26
> -#define LM3632_LDO_VSEL_MAX 0x29
> +#define LM3632_LDO_VSEL_MAX 0x28
Similar comment as I made on the LM36274
These are 0 based registers so it is 28 + 1
Dan
> #define LM3632_VBOOST_MIN 4500000
> #define LM3632_VLDO_MIN 4000000
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists