lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190626110847.2dfdf72c@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:08:47 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RT 4/4] rcutorture: Avoid problematic critical
 section nesting

On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:59:55 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> I have no objection to the outlawing of a number of these sequences in
> mainline, but am rather pointing out that until they really are outlawed
> and eliminated, rcutorture must continue to test them in mainline.
> Of course, an rcutorture running in -rt should avoid testing things that
> break -rt, including these sequences.

We should update lockdep to complain about these sequences. That would
"outlaw" them in mainline. That is, after we clean up all the current
sequences in the code. And we also need to get Linus's approval of this
as I believe he was against enforcing this in the past.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ