[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906280052380.32342@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:53:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 26/29] x86/hpet: Consolidate clockevent functions
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > s/hpet_clkevt_msi_resume
> > /hpet_clkevt_tick_resume
> >
> > ... unless the name variations have some hidden purpose and meaning?
>
> Historical but we want to preserve some of the old stuff for sentimental
> reasons.
The msi_resume naming actually has a real reason as there is also the
legacy_resume one.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists