[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190627072718.GA24279@krava>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:27:18 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per
symbol
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:09:26PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
> +
> +static int process_block_per_sym(struct hist_entry *he)
> +{
> + struct annotation *notes;
> + struct cyc_hist *ch;
> + struct block_hist *bh;
> +
> + if (!he->ms.map || !he->ms.sym)
> + return 0;
> +
> + notes = symbol__annotation(he->ms.sym);
> + if (!notes || !notes->src || !notes->src->cycles_hist)
> + return 0;
> +
> + bh = container_of(he, struct block_hist, he);
> + init_block_hist(bh);
> +
> + ch = notes->src->cycles_hist;
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < symbol__size(he->ms.sym); i++) {
> + if (ch[i].num_aggr) {
> + struct block_info *bi;
> + struct hist_entry *he_block;
> +
> + bi = block_info__new();
> + if (!bi)
> + return -1;
> +
> + init_block_info(bi, he->ms.sym, &ch[i], i);
> + he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
> + NULL, &dummy_al, bi);
nit, it's the only caller of hists__add_entry_block, so we don't need
the 'ops' argument in there
other than this, this all looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists