linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per symbol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ceae45ed-f1e7-ad4e-78ab-a56f0ae0d11e@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:34:38 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] perf diff: Use hists to manage basic blocks per
 symbol



On 6/27/2019 3:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:09:26PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> +
>> +static int process_block_per_sym(struct hist_entry *he)
>> +{
>> +	struct annotation *notes;
>> +	struct cyc_hist *ch;
>> +	struct block_hist *bh;
>> +
>> +	if (!he->ms.map || !he->ms.sym)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	notes = symbol__annotation(he->ms.sym);
>> +	if (!notes || !notes->src || !notes->src->cycles_hist)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	bh = container_of(he, struct block_hist, he);
>> +	init_block_hist(bh);
>> +
>> +	ch = notes->src->cycles_hist;
>> +	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < symbol__size(he->ms.sym); i++) {
>> +		if (ch[i].num_aggr) {
>> +			struct block_info *bi;
>> +			struct hist_entry *he_block;
>> +
>> +			bi = block_info__new();
>> +			if (!bi)
>> +				return -1;
>> +
>> +			init_block_info(bi, he->ms.sym, &ch[i], i);
>> +			he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
>> +							  NULL, &dummy_al, bi);
> 
> nit, it's the only caller of hists__add_entry_block, so we don't need
> the 'ops' argument in there
> 
> other than this, this all looks good to me
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 

Hi Jiri,

Thanks so much!

Do you need me to send v6 which only removes the 'ops' argument from 
hists__add_entry_block? Or this v5 should be OK either?


Thanks
Jin Yao