lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:31:39 +0000
From:   <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
To:     <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:     <peda@...ntia.se>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>
Subject: Re: I2C filtering (was Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: add
 binding for enable-ana-filt)



On 27.06.2019 16:22, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> External E-Mail
> 
> 
> On 25/06/2019 11:55:33+0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> On 25/06/2019 09:14:13+0000, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
>>>>> Perhaps
>>>>>
>>>>> 	microchip,digital-filter;
>>>>> 	microchip,analog-filter;
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reviewing. The name of the property does not matter much to
>>>> me, and we have properties prefixed with vendor, and some are not.
>>>>
>>>> @Alexandre Belloni: which name you think it's best ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure, it depends on whether Wolfram thinks it is generic enough
>>> to be used without a vendor prefix.
>>
>> I could imagine that we design a generic property for filters. The ones
>> above make me wonder, though, because they are bool. I'd think you can
>> configure the filters in some way, too?
>>
> 
> Apart from enabling the filter there is indeed one configuration
> setting, the maximum pulse width of spikes to be suppressed by the input
> filter.

Hello,

This is a number 0 to 7 (3 bits) that represents the width of the spike 
in periph clock cycles.
I am looking to see what is PADFCFG , as it's related to the PAD analog 
filter configuration. It may be unused by the filter.

Eugen

> 
>> I never used such filtering, so I am unaware of the parameters needed /
>> suitable. Quick grepping through I2C master drivers reveals that
>> i2c-stm32f7.c also handles filters, but only with default values. Maybe
>> DT configuration would be benefitial to that driver, too?
>>
>> Adding some people to CC.
>>
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ