[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cb0e4ab-66c7-2b3d-27d3-fd5cfde8988f@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 22:18:53 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch
statement
On 28/06/2019 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:16:39PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> Currently the LP87565_DEVICE_TYPE_LP87561_Q1 case does not have a
>> break statement, causing it to fall through to a dev_err message.
>> Fix this by adding in the missing break statement.
>
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
>
So it applies cleanly against linux-next, I think the original code
landed in mfd/for-mfd-next - c.f. https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/28/550
Colin
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists