linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190702104420.GD4652@dell>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 11:44:20 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch
 statement

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Colin Ian King wrote:

> On 28/06/2019 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:16:39PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >>
> >> Currently the LP87565_DEVICE_TYPE_LP87561_Q1 case does not have a
> >> break statement, causing it to fall through to a dev_err message.
> >> Fix this by adding in the missing break statement.
> > 
> > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> > 
> So it applies cleanly against linux-next, I think the original code
> landed in mfd/for-mfd-next - c.f. https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/28/550

Applied, thanks Colin.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog