lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190628033303.GA1404256@magnolia>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:33:03 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] xfs: allow merging ioends over append boundaries

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:52:04AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:43:04PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> > > > ioend that doesn't.  We just need to move the append transaction to the
> > > > base ioend.  Also use the opportunity to use a real error code instead
> > > > of the magic 1 to cancel the transactions, and write a comment
> > > > explaining the scheme.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > > 
> > > Reading through this patch, I have a feeling it fixes the crash that
> > > Zorro has been seeing occasionally with generic/475...
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> > 
> > Zorro, can you confirm? If so it would be great to also refer to
> > the respective bugzilla entry #203947 [0].
> 
> Sure, I'll give it a test. But it's so hard to reproduce, I need long enough
> time to prove "the panic's gone".
> 
> BTW, should I only merge this single patch to test, or merge your whole patchset
> with 13 patches?

Just this one patch.

--D

> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
> > 
> > [0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203947
> > 
> >   Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ