[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190628135433.GE3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:54:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:41:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Or just don't do the wakeup at all, if it comes to that. I don't know
> of any way to determine whether rcu_read_unlock() is being called from
> the scheduler, but it has been some time since I asked Peter Zijlstra
> about that.
There (still) is no 'in-scheduler' state.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists