linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done flag and write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:35:30 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
Cc:     jonathan.derrick@...el.com,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz" <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de" 
        <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: sed-opal: add support for shadow MBR done
 flag and write

On 6/29/19 10:28 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:26:52AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/29/19 10:19 AM, Scott Bauer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Jens,
>>>
>>> Can you please stage these for 5.3 aswell?
>>
>> Yes, looks fine to me. But it conflicts with the psid revert in terms
>> of ioctl numbering. You fine with me renumbering IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE to:
>>
>> #define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE           _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
> 
> Sorry for the conflict. That's fine. I'll fix up userland tooling.

Renamed 232 -> 233, and 233 -> 234, for the two conflicts. So now we have:

#define IOC_OPAL_PSID_REVERT_TPR    _IOW('p', 232, struct opal_key)
#define IOC_OPAL_MBR_DONE           _IOW('p', 233, struct opal_mbr_done)
#define IOC_OPAL_WRITE_SHADOW_MBR   _IOW('p', 234, struct opal_shadow_mbr)

-- 
Jens Axboe