[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190629075312.GB28708@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:53:12 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, brian.brooks@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: Allow using a dedicated dma_mask
for platform_device
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 08:59:46AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'd much rather bite the bullet and make dev->dma_mask a scalar
> instead of a pointer. The pointer causes way to much boiler plate code,
> and the semantics are way to subtile. Below is a POV patch that
> compiles and boots with my usual x86 test config, and at least compiles
> with the arm and pmac32 defconfigs. It probably breaks just about
> everything else, but should give us an idea what is involve in the
> switch:
>
> ---
> >From ea73ba2d29f56ff6413066b10f018a671f2b26ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:24:01 +0200
> Subject: device.h: make dma_mask a scalar instead of a pointer
>
> Kill the dma_mask indirection to clean up the mess we acquired around
> it.
I have no objection to this at all. I would love to see the indirection
go away.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists