linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: Allow using a dedicated dma_mask for platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Jul 2019 13:24:39 +0200
From:   Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, brian.brooks@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: Allow using a dedicated dma_mask
 for platform_device

Hi Christoph,

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:59:46 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

>I'd much rather bite the bullet and make dev->dma_mask a scalar
>instead of a pointer.  The pointer causes way to much boiler plate code,
>and the semantics are way to subtile.

I agree that this the real solution, it just seemed a bit overwhelming
to me. I'll be happy to help with this though, now that you took a big
first step.

> Below is a POV patch that
>compiles and boots with my usual x86 test config, and at least compiles
>with the arm and pmac32 defconfigs.  It probably breaks just about
>everything else, but should give us an idea what is involve in the
>switch:

I'll test that on my boards too.

Thanks,

Maxime