[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190701132340.21123dee@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 13:24:39 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, brian.brooks@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: platform: Allow using a dedicated dma_mask
for platform_device
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:59:46 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>I'd much rather bite the bullet and make dev->dma_mask a scalar
>instead of a pointer. The pointer causes way to much boiler plate code,
>and the semantics are way to subtile.
I agree that this the real solution, it just seemed a bit overwhelming
to me. I'll be happy to help with this though, now that you took a big
first step.
> Below is a POV patch that
>compiles and boots with my usual x86 test config, and at least compiles
>with the arm and pmac32 defconfigs. It probably breaks just about
>everything else, but should give us an idea what is involve in the
>switch:
I'll test that on my boards too.
Thanks,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists