lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:33:34 +0000
From:   Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] PCI: Patch series to support Thunderbolt without
 any BIOS support

On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 03:56:19AM +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Ben, Logan]
> 
> Ben, Logan, since you're looking at the resource code, maybe you'd be
> interested in this as well?
> 
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:30:30PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> > Rebase patches to apply cleanly to 5.2-rc1 source. Remove patch for 
> > comment style cleanup as this has already been applied.
> 
> Thanks for rebasing these.
> 
> They do apply cleanly, but they seem to be base64-encoded MIME
> attachments, and I don't know how to make mutt extract them easily.  I
> had to save each patch attachment individually, apply it, insert the
> commit log manually, etc.
> 
> Is there any chance you could send the next series as plain-text
> patches?  That would be a lot easier for me.
> 
> > Anybody interested in testing, you can do so with:
> > 
> > a) Intel system with Thunderbolt 3 and native enumeration. The Gigabyte 
> > Z390 Designare is one of the most perfect for this that I have never had 
> > the opportunity to use - it does not even have the option for BIOS 
> > assisted enumeration present in the BIOS.
> > 
> > b) Any system with PCIe and the Gigabyte GC-TITAN RIDGE add-in card, 
> > jump the header as described and use kernel parameters like:
> > 
> > pci=assign-busses,hpbussize=0x33,realloc,hpmemsize=128M,hpmemprefsize=1G,nocrs 
> > pcie_ports=native
> > 
> > [optional] pci.dyndbg
> > 
> >     ___
> >  __/   \__
> > |o o o o o| When looking into the receptacle on back of PCIe card.
> > |_________| Jump pins 3 and 5.
> > 
> >  1 2 3 4 5
> > 
> > The Intel system is nice in that it should just work. The add-in card 
> > setup is nice in that you can go nuts and assign copious amounts of 
> > MMIO_PREF - can anybody show a Xeon Phi coprocessor with 16G BAR working 
> > in an eGPU enclosure with these patches?
> > 
> > However, if you specify the above kernel parameters on the Intel system, 
> > you should be able to override it to allocate more space.
> > 
> > Nicholas Johnson (4):
> >   PCI: Consider alignment of hot-added bridges when distributing
> >     available resources
> >   PCI: Modify extend_bridge_window() to set resource size directly
> >   PCI: Fix bug resulting in double hpmemsize being assigned to MMIO
> >     window
> >   PCI: Add pci=hpmemprefsize parameter to set MMIO_PREF size
> >     independently
> > 
> >  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   7 +-
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c                             |  18 +-
> >  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c                       | 265 ++++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/pci.h                           |   3 +-
> >  4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> > 
I posted PATCH v7, finally. I needed a place to announce that the 
patches 1-2/8 which were made by Bjorn would not send with him as the 
"from" which seems to attribute the author.

Credits go to Bjorn for PATCH v7 1-2/8 (the first two patches) but to
send them I had to put myself in that field.

When applying them, I guess you will have to modify that field, Bjorn. 
My apologies if there was a way around it.

Thanks for all the comments and feedback from everybody.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ