[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190701144026.GF3463@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 16:40:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] augmented rbtree: rework the RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS
macro definition
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 09:46:30AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 05:49:52PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > The motivation for this change is that I want to introduce augmented rbtree
> > uses where the augmented data for the subtree is a struct instead of a scalar.
> Can't we have a helper macro that converts an old (scalar) style compute
> into a new style compute and avoid this unfortunate and error prone
> copy/pasta ?
Or add a RBEQUAL argument that does:
- if (node->RBAUGMENTED == augmented)
+ if (RBEQUAL(&node->RBAUGMENTED, &augmented))
With a bit of foo you can even provide a default implementation that
does: *a == *b.
See GEN_UNARY_RMWcc() for how to do that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists