[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190701144039.GD21774@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:40:41 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, will.deacon@....com,
julien.thierry@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 12/18] arm64: assembler: Add macro to annotate asm
function having non standard stack-frame.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:55:42AM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -752,4 +752,17 @@ USER(\label, ic ivau, \tmp2) // invalidate I line PoU
> .Lyield_out_\@ :
> .endm
>
> + /*
> + * This macro is the arm64 assembler equivalent of the
> + * macro STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD define at
> + * ~/include/linux/frame.h
> + */
> + .macro asm_stack_frame_non_standard func
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
> + .pushsection ".discard.func_stack_frame_non_standard"
> + .8byte \func
Nitpicks:
Does .quad vs .8byte make any difference?
Could we place this in include/linux/frame.h directly with a generic
name (and some __ASSEMBLY__ guards)? It doesn't look to be arm specific.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists