linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <34af4938-f472-9d9b-e615-397217023004@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 15:15:42 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg
 caches

On 7/2/19 3:09 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab
>> index 29601d93a1c2..2a3d0fc4b4ac 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-slab
>> @@ -429,10 +429,12 @@ KernelVersion:	2.6.22
>>  Contact:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
>>  		Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
>>  Description:
>> -		The shrink file is written when memory should be reclaimed from
>> -		a cache.  Empty partial slabs are freed and the partial list is
>> -		sorted so the slabs with the fewest available objects are used
>> -		first.
>> +		A value of '1' is written to the shrink file when memory should
>> +		be reclaimed from a cache.  Empty partial slabs are freed and
>> +		the partial list is sorted so the slabs with the fewest
>> +		available objects are used first.  When a value of '2' is
>> +		written, all the corresponding child memory cgroup caches
>> +		should be shrunk as well.  All other values are invalid.
>>  
> This should likely call out that '2' also does '1', that might not be 
> clear enough.

You are right. I will reword the text to make it clearer.


>>  What:		/sys/kernel/slab/cache/slab_size
>>  Date:		May 2007
>> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
>> index 3b22931bb557..a16b2c7ff4dd 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab.h
>> +++ b/mm/slab.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *);
>>  void __kmemcg_cache_deactivate(struct kmem_cache *s);
>>  void __kmemcg_cache_deactivate_after_rcu(struct kmem_cache *s);
>>  void slab_kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *);
>> +int kmem_cache_shrink_all(struct kmem_cache *s);
>>  
>>  struct seq_file;
>>  struct file;
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index 464faaa9fd81..493697ba1da5 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -981,6 +981,49 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_shrink);
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * kmem_cache_shrink_all - shrink a cache and all its memcg children
>> + * @s: The root cache to shrink.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 if successful, -EINVAL if not a root cache
>> + */
>> +int kmem_cache_shrink_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
>> +{
>> +	struct kmem_cache *c;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)) {
>> +		kmem_cache_shrink(s);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +	if (!is_root_cache(s))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The caller should have a reference to the root cache and so
>> +	 * we don't need to take the slab_mutex. We have to take the
>> +	 * slab_mutex, however, to iterate the memcg caches.
>> +	 */
>> +	get_online_cpus();
>> +	get_online_mems();
>> +	kasan_cache_shrink(s);
>> +	__kmem_cache_shrink(s);
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>> +	for_each_memcg_cache(c, s) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Don't need to shrink deactivated memcg caches.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (s->flags & SLAB_DEACTIVATED)
>> +			continue;
>> +		kasan_cache_shrink(c);
>> +		__kmem_cache_shrink(c);
>> +	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
>> +	put_online_mems();
>> +	put_online_cpus();
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  bool slab_is_available(void)
>>  {
>>  	return slab_state >= UP;
> I'm wondering how long this could take, i.e. how long we hold slab_mutex 
> while we traverse each cache and shrink it.

It will depends on how many memcg caches are there. Actually, I have
been thinking about using the show method to show the time spent in the
last shrink operation. I am just not sure if it is worth doing. What do
you think?

-Longman