[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190702073522.blujpmxddw7brr7c@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 09:35:22 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Anson.Huang@....com
Cc: shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, aisheng.dong@....com, abel.vesa@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] soc: imx-scu: Add SoC UID(unique identifier) support
Hi Anson,
On 19-06-28 11:25, Anson.Huang@....com wrote:
> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>
> Add i.MX SCU SoC's UID(unique identifier) support, user
> can read it from sysfs:
>
> root@...8qxpmek:~# cat /sys/devices/soc0/soc_uid
> 7B64280B57AC1898
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> - Improve the comment of skipping SCFW API return value check for getting UID.
> ---
> drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx-scu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx-scu.c b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx-scu.c
> index 676f612..3eacb54 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx-scu.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx-scu.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,40 @@ struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_id {
> } data;
> } __packed;
>
> +struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_uid {
> + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> + u32 uid_low;
> + u32 uid_high;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +static ssize_t soc_uid_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_uid msg;
> + struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr;
> + u64 soc_uid;
> +
> + hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION;
> + hdr->svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_MISC;
> + hdr->func = IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_UNIQUE_ID;
> + hdr->size = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * SCU FW API always returns an error even the
> + * function is successfully executed, so skip
> + * returned value check.
> + */
> + imx_scu_call_rpc(soc_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
Please can you add a TODO: or FIXME: tag and also provide the firmware
version containing the bug? I know that developers are very busy and
follow-up fixes never reach mainline ;)
Regards,
Marco
> +
> + soc_uid = msg.uid_high;
> + soc_uid <<= 32;
> + soc_uid |= msg.uid_low;
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%016llX\n", soc_uid);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(soc_uid);
> +
> static int imx_scu_soc_id(void)
> {
> struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_id msg;
> @@ -102,6 +136,11 @@ static int imx_scu_soc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto free_revision;
> }
>
> + ret = device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev),
> + &dev_attr_soc_uid);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_revision;
> +
> return 0;
>
> free_revision:
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists