[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB3916EE2A43DAFFEAB592BE61F5F80@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 07:38:07 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
CC: "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] soc: imx-scu: Add SoC UID(unique identifier) support
Hi, Marco
> > + hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION;
> > + hdr->svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_MISC;
> > + hdr->func = IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_UNIQUE_ID;
> > + hdr->size = 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * SCU FW API always returns an error even the
> > + * function is successfully executed, so skip
> > + * returned value check.
> > + */
> > + imx_scu_call_rpc(soc_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
>
> Please can you add a TODO: or FIXME: tag and also provide the firmware
> version containing the bug? I know that developers are very busy and follow-
> up fixes never reach mainline ;)
As I replied in previous mail, I will send out a V3 with below comment:
+ /*
+ * SCU FW API does NOT have returned value for
+ * this function, so skip returned value check.
+ */
+ imx_scu_call_rpc(soc_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
Thanks,
Anson.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists