linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:06:59 +0530
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
CC:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch
 statement



On 02/07/19 5:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2019, Colin Ian King wrote:
> 
>> On 02/07/2019 11:44, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Colin Ian King wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28/06/2019 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:16:39PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>>>>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently the LP87565_DEVICE_TYPE_LP87561_Q1 case does not have a
>>>>>> break statement, causing it to fall through to a dev_err message.
>>>>>> Fix this by adding in the missing break statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
>>>>>
>>>> So it applies cleanly against linux-next, I think the original code
>>>> landed in mfd/for-mfd-next - c.f. https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/28/550
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks Colin.
>>>
>> I'm confused, who is the official maintainer of the regulator patches
>> nowadays?
> 
> Mark.  But the patch you're fixing is currently in the MFD tree.
> 
> I sent him an updated pull-request.

Thanks Lee!

> 
> Don't worry mate, you're in good hands. ;)
>