linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190702122426.GI2793@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:26 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] regulator: lp87565: fix missing break in switch
 statement

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:12:10PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 02/07/2019 11:44, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Colin Ian King wrote:

> >> So it applies cleanly against linux-next, I think the original code
> >> landed in mfd/for-mfd-next - c.f. https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/28/550

> > Applied, thanks Colin.

> I'm confused, who is the official maintainer of the regulator patches
> nowadays?

Me and Liam but since this patch only applies against Lee's tree he's
applied it there (I didn't think it was worth me picking up the entire
cross tree merge branch Lee prepared for this one fix, if Lee hadn't
picked it up it'd have waited till after the merge window).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)