linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] scsi: bfa: Make two functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190702132324.48136-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 21:23:24 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>, <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] scsi: bfa: Make two functions static

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c:6982:1: warning: symbol 'bfa_flash_sem_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c:6995:1: warning: symbol 'bfa_flash_sem_put' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c
index 93471d7..aae1db1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c
@@ -6970,7 +6970,7 @@ bfa_raw_sem_get(void __iomem *bar)
 
 }
 
-bfa_status_t
+static bfa_status_t
 bfa_flash_sem_get(void __iomem *bar)
 {
 	u32 n = FLASH_BLOCKING_OP_MAX;
@@ -6983,7 +6983,7 @@ bfa_flash_sem_get(void __iomem *bar)
 	return BFA_STATUS_OK;
 }
 
-void
+static void
 bfa_flash_sem_put(void __iomem *bar)
 {
 	writel(0, (bar + FLASH_SEM_LOCK_REG));
-- 
2.7.4