linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: correct dsi mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF6AEGsUve1NnzF2kEeW0jwgXnxZTgFaHbq-c-+CKru1jS9tWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:12:31 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
Cc:     "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: correct dsi mode_flags

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:09 AM Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Noticed while comparing register dump of how bootloader configures DSI
> > vs how kernel configures.  It seems the bridge still works either way,
> > but fixing this clears the 'CHA_DATATYPE_ERR' error status bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index a6f27648c015..c8fb45e7b06d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -342,8 +342,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >         /* TODO: setting to 4 lanes always for now */
> >         dsi->lanes = 4;
> >         dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
> > -       dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE |
> > -                         MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_HSE;
> > +       dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO;
>
> Did you check this against the datasheet?  Per my reading, EOT_PACKET
> and VIDEO_HSE appear valid.  I don't know about VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE.

The EOT flat is badly named:

/* disable EoT packets in HS mode */
#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET    BIT(9)

I can double check out HSE, but this was one of the setting
differences between bootloader and kernel

BR,
-R