[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190703130439.GR9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:04:39 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:32:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c
>
> between commit:
>
> a3487d8f3063 ("ACPI / sleep: Switch to use acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev()")
>
> from the pm tree and commit:
>
> 418e3ea157ef ("bus_find_device: Unify the match callback with class_find_device")
>
> from the driver-core tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Thank you, the fix looks correct!
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists