lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 07:31:58 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <>
To:     Joel Stanley <>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <>,
        Greg KH <>,
        Jeremy Kerr <>,
        Alistair Popple <>,
        Eddie James <>,,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] FSI changes for 5.3

Hi Joel,

On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:03:18 +0000 Joel Stanley <> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 05:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 03:39 +0000, Joel Stanley wrote:  
> > >
> > > We've not had a MAINAINERS entry for drivers/fsi, so this fixes that. It names
> > > Jeremy and I as maintainers, so if it works for you we will send pull requests
> > > to you each cycle.  
> >
> > Ack. I no longer work for IBM and thus cannot handle that subsystem
> > anymore.  
> Stephen, can you swap out ben's fsi tree in linux-next for this one:
> git://
> Branch is 'next'.

There is no "next" branch in that tree, so for now I have used the
master branch.   I have replaced Ben with you and Jeremy as contacts.

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists